Feel free to take this personally.
Please. I insist.
22 hours ago with 158,919 notes — via aeternum-young, © twentyonepuns


“Why does this keep happening?”

“Maybe it’s the altitude.”

1 day ago with 4,056 notes — via silvercistern, © uzumakies


fuckyeahnauticalfashion:

Victorian Maiden

1 day ago with 29,956 notes — via districtunrest, © victorianmaiden.com


mybigfatredwedding:

How Did You Find That Untagged Post From 11 Months Ago a story of confusion, fear, and general unease

1 day ago with 29,511 notes — via arthurpendragoff, © mybigfatredwedding


featherumbrellas:

The only thing better than hot boys and book stores are hot boys in book stores

1 day ago with 66,110 notes — via galetobias, © featherumbrellas


ladya-bsb-nsync-m5: the-hashslingingslasher: rawshyt: THE POWER OF THE VAGINA look at the gravitational pull of her vagina! he gets sucked right into it Amazing. omfg dat ass grab yo Holy fuck the hashslingingslasher I knew you were a homeboy

ladya-bsb-nsync-m5:

the-hashslingingslasher:

rawshyt:

THE POWER OF THE VAGINA

look at the gravitational pull of her vagina! he gets sucked right into it

Amazing.

omfg dat ass grab yo

Holy fuck the hashslingingslasher I knew you were a homeboy

2 days ago with 26,039 notes — via pseudopenname808, © fraaaaaaank


"Feminism is anti-sexism. A male who has divested of male privilege, who has embraced feminist politics, is a worthy comrade in struggle, in no way a threat to feminism, whereas a female who remains wedded to sexist thinking and behavior infiltrating feminist movement is a dangerous threat. Significantly, the most powerful intervention made by consciousness-raising groups was the demand that all females confront their internalized sexism, their allegiance to patriarchal thinking and action, and their commitment to feminist conversion. That intervention is still needed. It remains the necessary step for anyone choosing feminist politics. The enemy within must be transformed before we can confront the enemy outside. The threat, the enemy, is sexist thought and behavior. As long as females take up the banner of feminist politics without addressing and transforming their own sexism, ultimately the movement will be undermined."
—

-bell hooks, Feminism is for Everybody


just going to emphasize that last sentence again: As long as females take up the banner of feminist politics without addressing and transforming their own sexism, ultimately the movement will be undermined.

(via browndenim)

2 days ago with 939 notes — via pseudopenname808, © browndenim


sexintartarus: excuse you our porn is of the finest quality

sexintartarus:

excuse you our porn is of the finest quality

2 days ago with 64,109 notes — via yourpeetaisshowing, © sexintartarus


scott mccall + lacrosse

2 days ago with 548 notes — via prophecyspirit, © hoechlinsbutt


2 days ago with 1,673 notes — via im-the-slytherin-heir, © beejohn


2 days ago with 35,999 notes — via im-the-slytherin-heir, © onahighwire


actuallyamazingatheist:

i’m going to start referring to men as “our husbands, fathers, and sons” whenever i talk about issues that affect them.

2 days ago with 3,802 notes — via allies-person, © proudlybigotedmisandrist


thisis-mydesign: chef d’œuvre · a masterpiece

thisis-mydesign:

chef d’œuvre · a masterpiece

2 days ago with 628 notes — via shitletsrun, © thisis-mydesign


khajidont: BUT YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND FINNICK WOULD HAVE BEEN THE GREATEST DAD

khajidont:

BUT YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND

FINNICK WOULD HAVE BEEN THE GREATEST DAD

2 days ago with 865 notes — via bigbigbigday006, © khajidont


hawthornhedge: walkers-and-mutts: We wouldn’t have Peeta as a character and my life would be miserable. That would have been the outcome. Hand on heart, it is almost as if TPTB are trolling the Peeta fandom (even though it does seem that the FB page is from the publishers rather than the studios but it is still poor timing!).   Also, screw the people on the FB page who seem to equate their perceptions of Peeta’s masculinity with his worth as a human being. Seriously, it is the twenty-first century and we are still hung up on stereotypes?? In all earnestness, I think that if Gale and Katniss are tributes, the Games proceed as usual, and there is no rebellion. I’m of the school that it is the very particular combination of Katniss and Peeta that inspires unrest and the ultimate rebellion.  To me, it’s really Peeta’s romantic gambit that throws the Games (and, importantly, Katniss) off the Capitol-determined narrative of survival at any cost and sets the stage for the final defiance by Katniss and Peeta. Also, I don’t see Gale as one to discount his chances of winning: I think he was sincere when he was encouraging Katniss in the book, and he has the same skill set. Plus, so long as ONE of them survives, both families would be okay so Gale has every motivation to try to win.  Peeta didn’t think that he had any chance of winning, hence his strategy.  Both Katniss and Gale would score high, and both would be targets by the Careers, who would no longer be hampered by Peeta trying to throw them off Katniss’ track. I think that they would ally for at least part of the Games, but I can’t work out how long the alliance would last-Katniss is incredibly aware of the finite lifetimes of alliances.  I do think that it would be incredibly unlikely that both would make it to the final showdown. I also kind of wonder who Haymitch would “pick” of the two of them.

hawthornhedge:

walkers-and-mutts:

We wouldn’t have Peeta as a character and my life would be miserable. That would have been the outcome.

Hand on heart, it is almost as if TPTB are trolling the Peeta fandom (even though it does seem that the FB page is from the publishers rather than the studios but it is still poor timing!).  

Also, screw the people on the FB page who seem to equate their perceptions of Peeta’s masculinity with his worth as a human being. Seriously, it is the twenty-first century and we are still hung up on stereotypes??

In all earnestness, I think that if Gale and Katniss are tributes, the Games proceed as usual, and there is no rebellion. I’m of the school that it is the very particular combination of Katniss and Peeta that inspires unrest and the ultimate rebellion.  To me, it’s really Peeta’s romantic gambit that throws the Games (and, importantly, Katniss) off the Capitol-determined narrative of survival at any cost and sets the stage for the final defiance by Katniss and Peeta.

Also, I don’t see Gale as one to discount his chances of winning: I think he was sincere when he was encouraging Katniss in the book, and he has the same skill set. Plus, so long as ONE of them survives, both families would be okay so Gale has every motivation to try to win.  Peeta didn’t think that he had any chance of winning, hence his strategy. 

Both Katniss and Gale would score high, and both would be targets by the Careers, who would no longer be hampered by Peeta trying to throw them off Katniss’ track. I think that they would ally for at least part of the Games, but I can’t work out how long the alliance would last-Katniss is incredibly aware of the finite lifetimes of alliances.  I do think that it would be incredibly unlikely that both would make it to the final showdown. I also kind of wonder who Haymitch would “pick” of the two of them.

2 days ago with 66 notes — via hawthornhedge, © walkers-and-mutts